COMECOME 80 Cash: read the two qualifying routes
COME lists two routes for the 80 Cash referral milestone: a friend deposits and plays a first Mega Contest, or the friend reaches ₹1,000 effective turnover.
Read AND within the first route
The deposit and first Mega Contest play belong together in the first route. A deposit alone does not state completion of both actions. Keep the two requirements linked when explaining this route, rather than turning the first action into the entire milestone.
Read OR between the routes
The alternative concerns the friend’s effective turnover reaching ₹1,000. The word or separates this route from the deposit-plus-first-contest route. Do not change it into a requirement to complete all conditions from both routes, and do not equate effective turnover with deposit amount.
Keep the sign-up reward distinct
The reward labelled 30 Bonus belongs to the friend sign-up milestone. The 80 Cash stage is a separate part of the inviter programme. The labels, recipient and qualifying actions remain relevant even when a banner displays a combined ₹110 headline.
Read the account result without guessing
For a disputed milestone, identify which qualifying route the service record concerns and keep the actual status. Account recognition and timing must come from that record and the applicable programme terms. Do not invent a crediting deadline or promise that repeating a deposit will resolve it.
A practical example
If the friend has made a deposit but not played the first Mega Contest, that observation does not complete the first route. If the service shows ₹1,000 effective turnover, it concerns the alternative route. Keep the record and route together.
What a completed answer looks like
The two qualifying routes are stated accurately, and the 30 Bonus stage has not been merged into an unconditional 80 Cash payment.
Choose another specific COME guide